Homosexuals Problems

Feminism,Lesbian,Gay – same sex marriage invented by the elite psychopaths to:

-destroy the family unit

-undermine and divide the society and generations

-impact on kids

-gay people spread hiv

Those people are sick and needs to be cured.Read some articles below:


Gay Parents Conducive to Child Sexual Abuse

November 7, 2012

The Illuminati & Freemasonry are using gays to undermine heterosexual marriage & family, a long-term goal of their Communist Manifesto. A recent study shows just how dangerous same-sex parenting is. 

by Reality

Children raised by same-sex parents reported a 3-12 times higher incidence of sexual abuse than children living with both biological parents.

A July 2012 scholarly, peer-reviewed study in the journal, Social Science Research, by Professor Mark Regnerus, of the University of Texas, Austin,(left) found that:

• Children of lesbian mothers are nearly 12 times as likely to say they were sexually touched by a parent or adult as those raised in intact, biological families.

• 31% of those raised by lesbian mothers and 25 % raised by homosexual fathers were raped, compared to 8% of those raised in intact, biological families.

• 90% of children raised in a normative household were heterosexual, whereas 61% raised by a lesbian parent

and 71% raised by a homosexual father were not.

Further, children raised by same-sex parents were:

• Two to four times more likely to be on public assistance.

• More than twice as likely to be unemployed.

• Twice as likely to have contemplated suicide.

• More likely to seek treatment for mental illness.

• More likely to have engaged in unmarried sex.

• At greater risk of poverty, substance abuse, and criminality.


Homosexual advocates were furious about this study and as a result launched a withering attack.

It was imperative for them to discredit this study and destroy Professor Regnerus’s credibility.

Consequently, they charged him with scientific and scholarly misconduct, possible falsification of research, and deviating from ethical standards.

Because of the viciousness of these attacks, the University convened a four-person faculty committee and hired an outside expert in “research integrity” to conduct an inquiry.

The Committee concluded that none of the allegations against Professor Regnerus were substantiated, and that there was no scientific misconduct on his part.


Children need stability in their lives while growing up. Professor Regnerus found that parents who had samesex relationships were the least likely to exhibit such stability.

In this study, children raised by same-sex parents reported the highest incidence of living in foster care, with grandparents or living on their own before 18 years of age.

In fact, less than 2% of those with a mother in a same-sex relationship reported being with her for all 18-years of their childhood and youth.

The instability of same-sex partnerships is such that spending significant political, legal, social and economic capital to support such relationships cannot be justified. Nor, should children be used as tools and guinea pigs to further the dubious cause of same-sex marriage.


Lesbian Moms Messed Me Up

August 17, 2012
Raising a heterosexual child in a homosexual environment is child abuse. But this doesn’t stop the Illuminati’s “useful idiots” from working to destroy the nuclear family. The ultimate goal is for the State to take over human reproduction, Brave New World style.

Robert Lopez was raised by two lesbians. Here, he reveals how damaging this experience is.


Quite simply, growing up with gay parents was very difficult, and not because of prejudice from neighbors. … When your home life is so drastically different from everyone around you, in a fundamental way striking at basic physical relations, you grow up weird.

I have no mental health disorders or biological conditions. I just grew up in a house so unusual that I was destined to exist as a social outcast.

My peers learned all the unwritten rules of decorum and body language in their homes; they understood what was appropriate to say in certain settings and what wasn’t; they learned both traditionally masculine and traditionally feminine social mechanisms.

Even if my peers’ parents were divorced, and many of them were, they still grew up seeing male and female social models. They learned, typically, how to be bold and unflinching from male figures and how to write thank-you cards and be sensitive from female figures.

These are stereotypes, of course, but stereotypes come in handy when you inevitably leave the safety of your lesbian mom’s trailer and have to work and survive in a world where everybody thinks in stereotypical terms, even gays.

I had no male figure at all to follow, and my mother and her partner were both unlike traditional fathers or traditional mothers. As a result, I had very few recognizable social cues to offer potential male or female friends, since I was neither confident nor sensitive to others.

Thus I befriended people rarely, and alienated others easily. Gay people who grew up in straight parents’ households may have struggled with their sexual orientation; but when it came to the vast social universe of adaptations not dealing with sexuality–how to act, how to speak, how to behave–they had the advantage of learning at home. Many gays don’t realize what a blessing it was to be reared in a traditional home.

My home life was not traditional nor conventional. I suffered because of it, in ways that are difficult for sociologists to index.

Both nervous and yet blunt, I would later seem strange even in the eyes of gay and bisexual adults who had little patience for someone like me. I was just as odd to them as I was to straight people.

Life is hard when you are strange. Even now, I have very few friends and often feel as though I do not understand people because of the unspoken gender cues that everyone around me, even gays raised in traditional homes, takes for granted. Though I am hard-working and a quick learner, I have trouble in professional settings because co-workers find me bizarre.

In terms of sexuality, gays who grew up in traditional households benefited from at least seeing some kind of functional courtship rituals around them. I had no clue how to make myself attractive to girls.

When I stepped outside of my mothers’ trailer, I was immediately tagged as an outcast because of my girlish mannerisms, funny clothes, lisp, and outlandishness. Not surprisingly, I left high school as a virgin, never having had a girlfriend, instead having gone to four proms as a wisecracking sidekick to girls who just wanted someone to chip in for a limousine.

When I got to college, I set off everyone’s “gaydar” and the campus LGBT group quickly descended upon me to tell me it was 100-percent certain I must be a homosexual. When I came out as bisexual, they told everyone I was lying and just wasn’t ready to come out of the closet as gay yet.


Frightened and traumatized by my mother’s death, I dropped out of college in 1990 and fell in with what can only be called the gay underworld. Terrible things happened to me there.

It was not until I was twenty-eight that I suddenly found myself in a relationship with a woman… I call myself bisexual because it would take several novels to explain how I ended up “straight” after almost thirty years as a gay man. I don’t feel like dealing with gay activists skewering me the way they go on search-and-destroy missions against ex-gays, “closet cases,” or “homocons.”

Though I have a biography particularly relevant to gay issues, the first person who contacted me to thank me for sharing my perspective on LGBT issues was Mark Regnerus, in an email dated July 17, 2012. I was not part of his massive survey, but he noticed a comment I’d left on a website about it and took the initiative to begin an email correspondence.

Forty-one years I’d lived, and nobody–least of all gay activists–had wanted me to speak honestly about the complicated gay threads of my life. If for no other reason than this, Mark Regnerus deserves tremendous credit–and the gay community ought to be crediting him rather than trying to silence him.

Regnerus’s study identified 248 adult children of parents who had same-sex romantic relationships. Offered a chance to provide frank responses with the hindsight of adulthood, they gave reports unfavorable to the gay marriage equality agenda. Yet the results are backed up by an important thing in life called common sense: Growing up different from other people is difficult and the difficulties raise the risk that children will develop maladjustments or self-medicate with alcohol and other dangerous behaviors. Each of those 248 is a human story, no doubt with many complexities.

Like my story, these 248 people’s stories deserve to be told. The gay movement is doing everything it can to make sure that nobody hears them. But I care more about the stories than the numbers (especially as an English professor), and Regnerus stumbled unwittingly on a narrative treasure chest.

So why the code of silence from LGBT leaders? I can only speculate from where I’m sitting. I cherish my mother’s memory, but I don’t mince words when talking about how hard it was to grow up in a gay household. Earlier studies examined children still living with their gay parents, so the kids were not at liberty to speak, governed as all children are by filial piety, guilt, and fear of losing their allowances. For trying to speak honestly, I’ve been squelched, literally, for decades….


Especially damning is the liberal attitude that we shouldn’t be judgmental about sex. In the Bronx gay world, I cleaned out enough apartments of men who’d died of AIDS to understand that resistance to sexual temptation is central to any kind of humane society. Sex can be hurtful not only because of infectious diseases but also because it leaves us vulnerable and more likely to cling to people who don’t love us, mourn those who leave us, and not know how to escape those who need us but whom we don’t love. The left understands none of that. That’s why I am conservative.

Our children do not arrive with clean legal immunity. As a man, though I am bisexual, I do not get to throw away the mother of my child as if she is a used incubator. I had to help my wife through the difficulties of pregnancy and postpartum depression. When she is struggling with discrimination against mothers or women at a sexist workplace, I have to be patient and listen. I must attend to her sexual needs.

Once I was a father, I put aside my own homosexual past and vowed never to divorce my wife or take up with another person, male or female, before I died. I chose that commitment in order to protect my children from dealing with harmful drama, even as they grow up to be adults. When you are a parent, ethical questions revolve around your children and you put away your self-interest . . . forever.

Robert Lopez is assistant professor of English at California State University-Northridge. He is the author of Colorful Conservative: American Conversations with the Ancients from Wheatley to Whitman. This year he will be publishing novels he wrote in the 1990s and 2000s.


Homosexual Adoption is Child Abuse

March 4, 2009

If I were a lawyer, I’d make a specialty of suing the all 15 States that allow same-sex adoption. My clients would be young adults whose lives were destroyed because these jurisdictions ignored their innate heterosexuality. I would wager that this arrogant flouting of nature will cost hundreds of millions in restitution.

Google “coming out”  and compare the resources available to young would-be homosexuals with the callous indifference to innocent heterosexual children who don’t have necessary heterosexual role models at home and don’t know what’s wrong.

The most outrageous example of this Bolshevik denial of gender differences is the story of David Reimer who was raised as a girl because his genitals were deformed in a botched circumcision.

This stealth war on heterosexuals (disguised as woman’s and gay rights) is designed to destabilize society in advance of the New World Order. The destruction of the nuclear family has long been the Illuminati Communist goal. They wish to make arrested development (homosexuality) the new norm. Lesbianism is the hidden agenda of feminism. Marriage and family are essential to our natural development. But, despite the deceitful propaganda, most male homosexuals don’t want marriage or children. They want sex.

See this 1969 document from Rockefeller-funded “Planned Parenthood” which plots to promote homosexuality and feminism so as to decrease US fertility. (Berelson-Jaffe Chart)

Because promoting homosexuality is the elite Agenda, the research on same-sex parenting is highly politicized. Thus, we have numerous nonsensical claims that homosexual parenting is as good for the child or better than a stable heterosexual marriage. Here is a study that actually claims that more than half of gay men want to have children! It says that in 2007, an estimated two million GLB people were interested in adopting. An estimated 65,500 adopted children were living with a lesbian or gay parent. More than 16,000 adopted children are living with lesbian and gay parents in California, the highest number among the states. Gay and lesbian parents are raising four percent of all adopted children in the United States.

I’m not saying that none of these parents have merit. I am saying that it is wrong to place heterosexual children with homosexual parents.


Perhaps it is too soon to hear from the victims of same-sex placements. But a young woman, Dawn Stefanowicz, whose father was a homosexual, has published a book, “Out from Under-The Impact of Homosexual Parenting.”  I haven’t read it but a review by Real Women of Canada indicates her father, who died of AIDS in 1991, acted as feared:

[Her father] failed utterly in protecting and affirming her both as a person, and as a woman. Instead her father, who was himself the product of a drunken abusive father and who was sexually and physically abused many times as a child, spent his entire life looking for a father figure himself who would love, affirm and attend to him. That is, he longed for and sought to obtain male companionship and love through his gay lifestyle to meet his own emotional needs. In so doing, he failed to provide attention and affection for his wife and children who were left to cope alone. Unfortunately, Dawn’s mother was an ineffective and submissive person who was overwhelmed with her own neediness, and did little to help her children in their agony.

Dawn’s father brought a succession of lovers into the home where his sexual acts were often carried out and which Dawn sometimes witnessed…Dawn was forced by her father to watch sexually perverse and violent TV [videos]…

The lesson learned from the book is that the homosexual demand for the “right” to adopt children or bring them into the same-sex relationship by way of medical technology on the basis that they are supposedly equally good parents as heterosexuals, is a fraud. Vulnerable children need both a father and a mother to love and protect them. They should not be used as instruments of social experimentation by narcissistic needy individuals who seek their sexual gratification and their identities outside the traditional family. (Reality, Jan-Feb. 2009, p 10)

Although she is Canadian, the Canadian media has sandbagged her book. (In contrast, conservative outlets in the US and Australia have interviewed her.) The taxpayer-funded CBC spews pro same-sex parenting propaganda and is not expected to be “balanced.” But Stefanowicz is told to give the “other side of the story.” It’s a case of, my belief is free speech and your belief is “hate.”  The truth is that “balanced” is when both sides are allowed to be heard.


The most common type of same sex parenting is by two lesbians. Dr. Dean Byrd, a psychiatrist testified that the “research clearly demonstrated that lesbian mothers had a feminizing effect on their sons and a masculinizing effect on their daughters. Boys raised by lesbian mothers behaved in less traditionally masculine ways, and girls, particularly adolescent and young girls raised by lesbian mothers, appear to have been more sexually adventurous and less chaste.”

A picture is worth a thousand words. Look at Zack (left) a boy raised by two mommies.

Dr. Byrd continued, “Children learn about male and female differences through parental modeling. The parental, mother-father relationship provides children with a model of marriage–the most meaningful, enduring relationship that the vast majority of individuals will have during their lives.”

Girls need their father’s approval to affirm their femininity and to eventually establish a bond with a man. Boys also need their father’s example to grow into strong independent men capable of leading families. All of this, the Bolshevik Masonic globalists are out to sabotage.

Society is in the grip of a long-term satanic conspiracy masquerading as “progressive” which is attempting to concentrate all wealth in the hands of the central bankers and their allies. They are re-engineering the human race to serve them in a neo feudal world order.

This is the real “hate” and we won’t be fooled or coerced.


its not sex - poster


Homosexuality -Proof Government Promotes Sickness

February 12, 2013

This is not “homophobic.” What homosexuals do is their business.
This is about the Illuminati pushing a destructive lifestyle on
heterosexuals. Their satanically-inspired,social engineering is our business.

The following information is based on two sources. 1. Comparing the Lifestyles of Homosexual Couples to Married Couples by Timothy Dailey Ph.D.  and 2. the book, “Homosexuality & the Politics of Truth” by Jeffrey Satinover, MD pp.49-70.

Remember, this is the “lifestyle” they are foisting on your children.

1.Duration of Relationship:

Heterosexuals: 66 percent of first marriages last ten years or longer, with fifty percent lasting twenty years or longer.

Male Homosexuals: In a survey of 7,862 homosexuals, only 15 percent describe their current relationship as having lasted twelve years or longer, with five percent lasting more than twenty years. “Typical gay city inhabitants spend most of their adult lives in ‘transactional’ relationships, or short-term commitments of less than six months.”

2.  Promiscuity

Heterosexuals:  Average of four lifetime partners. A nationally survey found that 77 percent of married men and 88 percent of married women had remained faithful to their marriage vows.

Male Homosexuals: The average male homosexual has 50 lifetime partners and as many as hundreds of sex partners. Bell and Weinberg found that 43 percent of white male homosexuals had sex with 500 or more partners, with 28 percent had one thousand or more sex partners. Most homosexual men understood sexual relations outside the relationship to be the norm and viewed adopting monogamous standards as an act of oppression.

3. Level of Commitment

Surprisingly few homosexuals and lesbians choose to enter into legally recognized unions where such arrangements are available.

In 2004, four years after passage, only about 21 percent of the estimated homosexual and lesbian population of Vermont had entered into civil unions. Put another way, 79 percent of homosexuals and lesbians in Vermont choose not to enter into civil unions. By contrast, in Vermont, heterosexual married couples outnumber cohabiting couples by a margin of 7 to 1, per capita.

4. Children

Only a small minority of gay and lesbian households have children. Beyond that, the evidence indicates that comparatively few homosexuals choose to establish households together–the type of setting that is normally prerequisite for the rearing of children.

5. Life Expectancy and Health Risks

Homosexuals experience a 25-35 year decrease in life expectancy. They suffer chronic potentially fatal liver disease and infectious hepatitis. Fatal immune disease includes associated rectal and other cancers.

Even those homosexual relationships that are loosely termed “monogamous” do not necessarily result in healthier behavior. The evidence indicates that homosexual and lesbian relationships are at far greater risk for contracting life-threatening disease compared with married couples. The journal AIDS reported that men involved in relationships engaged in anal intercourse and oral-anal intercourse with greater frequency than did those without a steady partner. Anal intercourse has been linked with a host of sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS.

6. Mental Health and Suicide

Homosexual and lesbian relationships experience a far greater rate of mental health problems compared to married couples. Homosexuals were 6.5 times more likely than their twins to have attempted suicide.

7.  Domestic Violence

Research indicates very high levels of violence in homosexual and lesbian relationships. In one survey, 90 percent of lesbians had been recipients of one or more acts of verbal aggression from their intimate partners during the prior year, with 31 percent reporting one or more incidents of physical abuse. In their book Men Who Beat the Men Who Love Them: Battered Gay Men and Domestic Violence, Island and Letellier state that “the incidence of domestic violence among gay men is nearly double that in the heterosexual population.” However, the Illuminati-controlled media has used  domestic violence to turn heterosexuality into a pathology.


“Gay rights” and “Gay marriage” are a ruse to hide a deliberate attack on heterosexual norms.

Dr. Dailey quotes Paula Ettelbrick, the former legal director of the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund: “Being queer is more than setting up house, sleeping with a person of the same gender, and seeking state approval for doing so….Being queer means pushing the parameters of sex, sexuality, and family, and in the process transforming the very fabric of society.”

Gay activists market homosexuality as the same as heterosexuality but they know better. One warns: “The masses must not be repulsed by premature exposure to homosexual behavior itself.” (Satinover, p.52)

Whether it is false flag state terrorism, vaccines or chemtrails, the Illuminati agenda is to weaken, depopulate and enslave society. The promotion of homosexuality is designed to destroy the fundamental building block of a healthy society: the traditional family.


Even Gays Say: This Gay Behavior is Sick

absolute world

Last week California legalized gay marriage. Why do you suppose the bankers wanted to placate the less than one per cent of the population who are  marriage-minded gays so badly that they are willing to redefine the central life ritual of 96% of the population who are heterosexual? Marriage is a heterosexual institution, mostly about reproduction. It’s like saying Muslims have an “equal right” to celebrate Passover.

The bankers want heterosexuals to suffer from the same gender confusion as homosexuals do, which makes it impossible to bond permanently with the opposite sex. As result, the vast majority of people will substitute promiscuity for love, marriage and family. Eventually the State will take over reproduction and indoctrination of the young. Here is an article I wrote in Nov. 2001 which tears the veil from the “homosexual lifestyle” they pretend is so attractive.

Imagine that an organism is sick. Imagine that the sick cells convince the organism that they were healthy, and in fact, the healthy cells are sick. The gullible organism would just get sicker and sicker.

This is the relationship between society and homosexuals today. Gays argue that same-sex behavior is no different than being left-handed. On the other hand, they say heterosexual behavior is not natural, but socially conditioned and “oppressive.” Heterosexual society and family are taking heavy casualties. Our stupid, opportunistic and craven leaders have betrayed us. We don’t even know we are at war.

Let’s decide whom, in fact, is sick.

Let’s look at gay behavior as defined by two gays, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen Ph.D., authors of “After the Ball: How America will Conquer its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 90’s”(1989).

In Chapter Six, they outline “ten categories of misbehavior,” drawn from their own experiences, wide reading and thousands of hours of conversation with hundreds of other gays. Their contention is that the male gay lifestyle, (not gay sexuality mind you), “is the pits.” They want gays to improve their image by addressing “what is wrong with a lot of gays.” (276)

What follows are some highlights. As you read this, ask yourself if there is another human community, including the Mafia that could make these generalizations about itself. Ask yourself if we haven’t caught this disease, or at least the sniffles.

  • The authors say “a surprisingly high percentage” of pathological liars and con men are gay. This results from a natural habit of self-concealment, and leads to a stubborn self-deception about one’s own gayness and its implication.
  • They say gays tend to reject all forms of morality and value judgments. Gay morality boils down to “I can do whatever I want and you can go to perdition. (If it feels good, I’ll do it!)” If a gay feels like seducing a trusted friend’s lover, he’ll do it, justifying it as an act of “sexual freedom” and the friend be damned.
  • They say gays suffer from a “narcissistic” personality disorder and give this clinical description: “pathological self absorption, a need for constant attention and admiration, lack of empathy or concern for others, quickly bored, shallow, interested in fads, seductive, overemphasis on appearance, superficially charming, promiscuous, exploitative, preoccupied with remaining youthful, relationships alternate between over idealization and devaluation.”
  • As an example of this narcissism, the authors say “a very sizable proportion of gay men” who have been diagnosed HIV positive continue to have unprotected sex.
  • They say the majority of gays are extremely promiscuous and self-indulgent. They must continuously up the ante to achieve arousal. This begins with alcohol and drugs and includes such “forbidden” aspects of sex as wallowing in filth (fetishism and coprophilia) and sadomasochism, which involves violence.
  • They say many gays indulge in sex in public bathrooms and think it is antigay harassment when it is stopped. Many think they have a right to importune straight males, including children.
  • Many gays are “single minded sexual predators” fixated on youth and physical beauty alone. When it comes to the old or ugly, gays are “the real queer bashers.” Disillusioned themselves, they are cynical about love.
  • “Relationships between gay men don’t usually last very long.” They quickly tire of their partners and fall victim to temptation. The “cheating ratio of ‘married’ gay males, given enough time, approaches 100%.”
  • Even friendships are based on the sexual test and hard to sustain. Unattractive gay men find it nearly impossible to find a friend, let alone a lover.
  • The authors say gays tend to deny reality in various ways: wishful thinking, paranoia, illogic, emotionalism and embracing crackpot ideas.

Is there any doubt that this behavior is sick? Obviously this is not true of all homosexuals. I feel no malice toward gays. I feel the same way about people who have the flu. I want them to get better and I don’t want it to spread.

Unfortunately, even the authors of this book are deceiving themselves. They claim that it is the gay lifestyle and NOT gay sexuality that is “the pits.” Who are they kidding? The two are inseparable.

The authors of this book are public relations experts who believe that “our problem is fundamentally one of bad image with straights.”

The book details “a comprehensive public-relations campaign that should go a long way towards sanitizing our very unsanitary image:”

“Desensitization”: flooding straight America with advertising presenting gays in the “least offensive manner possible.”

“Jamming”: Advertising that equates fear of gays with hatred of Jews, Blacks and women.

“Conversion”: Presenting images of gays that look like regular folks. “The image must be the icon of normality.”

They say “it makes no difference that the ads are lies” because “we are using them to…counter negative stereotypes that are every bit as much lies.”

This book was written in 1989 and obviously a campaign similar to this has taken effect. Read what the authors say about it:

“By Conversion, we mean something far more profoundly threatening to the American Way of Life [than subversion] …We mean conversion of the average American’s emotions, mind, and will, through a planned psychological attack, in the form of propaganda fed to the nation via the media. We mean…to turn their hatred into warm regard whether they like it or not.” (153)

Thus gays want Americans to learn that something they naturally and justifiably regard as sick, is in fact healthy. Thus Americans will be defenseless to resist their overtures whether in parks, barracks, bathrooms or classrooms.

It is a measure of the authors’ cynicism and self-deception that THEY quote psychologist M. Scott Peck, who in “People of the Lie” characterizes people who suffer from extreme or “malignant” narcissism simply as “evil.”

Evil people, Peck says, have “an unshakable will to be right and will not consider the possibility that they are wrong…Their main weapon, interestingly enough is the lie with which they distort reality to look good to themselves, and to confuse others.” (297)

The publicity surrounding gay marriage doesn’t reflect the reality. Gays don’t want to marry. In Canada, gay marriage has been legal for more than a year yet only one in one thousand marriages are homosexual. Gays and lesbians make up about 40 out of 1000 population.

Gay marriage is really designed to make heterosexuals see homosexual behavior as the new normal. They could have designated a separate but equal status for the homosexuals who want marriage.

Gays can continue to fool themselves. But let us stop. Their behavior is sick. And it’s contagious.


One night stands are linked to depression and suicidal thoughts, study reveals

Nov 2013

The new research suggests that no strings attached casual sex might not be as much fun as first thought

Casual sex and no strings arrangements have been linked to depression and suicidal thoughts by a new research study.

Somewhat shockingly, for every single sexual encounter the report suggests that the odds of suicidal thoughts jumped a staggering 18 PER CENT.

The study, lead by Dr Sara Sanberg-Thomas, suggested that casual sexual relationships were linked to poor mental health.

But they also found that the vice versa was true also, with people who show signs of depression and other similar mental illnesses being more likely to engage in casual sex.

Dr Sandberg-Thomas explained: “Several studies have found a link between poor mental health and casual sex, but the nature of that association has been unclear.

“There’s always been a question about which one is the cause and which is the effect.

“This study provides evidence that poor mental health can lead to casual sex, but also that casual sex leads to additional declines in mental health.”

The results were found to transcend gender boundaries with both men and women equally susceptible.



Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives.I think we’re being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I’m liable to be put away as insane for expressing that. That’s what’s insane about it.

– John Lennon
If you want to wake up mankind, first of all wake up entirely;
if you want to eliminate suffering from this world,first get rid of
all that dark and negative in you. The largest gift that you can
present to this world is your own transformation. – The old master
God can shield you.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s